Why is this so wrong when it is perfectly acceptable for a man to hit a significantly weaker man who hit him first or for a significantly stronger woman to hit a woman who hit her first? So basically it’s okay for a male pro bodybuilder to hit me back but it would be so wrong of him to hit back a female pro bodybuilder, who would be way stronger than I? Or it would be so wrong of me to hit back a woman a little weaker than I but it would be fine if a female pro bodybuilder (who is again way stronger than I) hit back the same woman?
Let’s suppose a guy is disguised as a woman (his disguise is very convincing) and hits another guy. Should that guy not hit back, because as far as he is concerned, he would be hitting a woman? Let’s suppose a woman is disguised as a man and hits a man, can that man hit back, because as far as he is concerned, he would be hitting another man?
Ivan Ivanovich- But why does the civilized person always have to be the man?
Harmony S- If you are having trouble giving a good explanation, then maybe this whole men shouldn’t hit back women thing is a flawed concept, right?
Taylor Alverit- Because women are weaker than men on average, our society, including our legal system, makes the generalization that men are not allowed to hit back women under any circumstances.
In the context of Singles and Dating, a lovers quarrel is not a fist fight. Someone has to be civilized.
its just wrong. nuff said.
Lol this is an odd question. .
But,I think it’s cuz Woman are the weaker and more delicate sex. Even if they are stronger then you they are still considered weaker and more delicate.
It’s not.
I’m a girl and if I hit a guy I’m not gonna get pissed if he hits me back.
I mean really, what does someone expect to happen when they hit someone?